You are viewing the MafiaScum.net Wiki. To play the game, visit the forum.

Refuge in Audacity: Difference between revisions

From MafiaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
Scummer [[MehPlusRawr]] initially used this strategy in [http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2297207#p2297207 Square Enix Mafia I: Diabolus Erus], claiming to be a a cute fuzzy kitten in spite of the fact that the game was Square-Enix flavored.  
Scummer [[MehPlusRawr]] initially used this strategy in [http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2297207#p2297207 Square Enix Mafia I: Diabolus Erus], claiming to be a a cute fuzzy kitten in spite of the fact that the game was Square-Enix flavored.  


Later scummer [[Chronopie]] used a similar defense, claiming to be a [http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2311032#p2311032 a lynchproof Serial Killer in the same game]. This was classified as a second cute fuzzy kitten defense.
Later scummer [[Chronopie]] used a similar defense, claiming to be a [http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2311032#p2311032 a lynchproof Serial Killer in the same game]. This was classified as a second cute fuzzy kitten defense. <-- Said scummer would like to dispute classification, as said claim was flavour based, rather than ridiculous.


[[Category: Glossary]]
[[Category: Glossary]]

Revision as of 12:09, 3 July 2010

Cute fuzzy kitten defense is an unlikely claim designed to create sympathy for a player who is under heavy pressure and the probable lynch.

1. The claim may defy game balance.

2. The claim may not match-up with night actions.

3. The claim may be simply absurd; see history for real-life examples.

History

Scummer MehPlusRawr initially used this strategy in Square Enix Mafia I: Diabolus Erus, claiming to be a a cute fuzzy kitten in spite of the fact that the game was Square-Enix flavored.

Later scummer Chronopie used a similar defense, claiming to be a a lynchproof Serial Killer in the same game. This was classified as a second cute fuzzy kitten defense. <-- Said scummer would like to dispute classification, as said claim was flavour based, rather than ridiculous.