You are viewing the MafiaScum.net Wiki. To play the game, visit the forum.
Ockham's Razor: Difference between revisions
(copied from old wiki) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
"Simple; if I'd told you, the [[Mafia]] would have killed me last night."</blockquote> | "Simple; if I'd told you, the [[Mafia]] would have killed me last night."</blockquote> | ||
This explanation seems simple, but by itself cannot be taken as proof. Maybe the player didn't [[ | This explanation seems simple, but by itself cannot be taken as proof. Maybe the player didn't [[roleclaim]] before, not because they were the Doctor, but because '''they''' were [[Mafia]] who wanted an 'out' in case they killed the Doctor at [[Night]] (see also [[Wine In Front Of Me]]). | ||
[[Category:Theory]] | [[Category:Theory]] | ||
Revision as of 11:28, 30 January 2007
"Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything" -- William of Ockham (1285-1349)
Also called Occam's Razor, this is the philosophical idea of "going with" the explanation which requires the least assumptions. It is sometimes paraphrased as "the simplest answer is best", but that is probably overly simplistic!
Occam's Razor is a double-edged weapon in Mafia games, however, as it can be used by Scum to cloak their actions.
"Why didn't you tell us you were a Doctor before you were BandWagon'ned?"
"Simple; if I'd told you, the Mafia would have killed me last night."
This explanation seems simple, but by itself cannot be taken as proof. Maybe the player didn't roleclaim before, not because they were the Doctor, but because they were Mafia who wanted an 'out' in case they killed the Doctor at Night (see also Wine In Front Of Me).