You are viewing the MafiaScum.net Wiki. To play the game, visit the forum.

ORLYScum: Difference between revisions

From MafiaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: A form of circular reasoning <blockquote> "If X is scum, then his arguments are scummy. X is scum. Therefore, X's arguments are scummy." This is an invalid argument. It's not a good way ...)
 
m (formatted and categorized)
Line 1: Line 1:
A form of circular reasoning
A form of [[Circular Reasoning]]


<blockquote>
<blockquote>
"If X is scum, then his arguments are scummy.
1) If X is scum, then his arguments are scummy.<br />
X is scum.
2) X is scum.<br />
Therefore, X's arguments are scummy."
3) Therefore, X's arguments are scummy.</blockquote>


This is an invalid argument. It's not a good way to persuade anyone else that player X is scum, except perhaps that it might draw attention to the fact that player X hasn't produced any good arguments or evidence in his favour. It might have value in terms of getting a reaction from player X or other players.
This is an invalid argument. It's not a good way to persuade anyone else that player X is scum, except perhaps that it might draw attention to the fact that player X hasn't produced any good arguments or evidence in his favour.  
</blockquote>
 
It may have value in terms of getting a reaction from player X or other players.
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]

Revision as of 13:04, 23 June 2008

A form of Circular Reasoning

1) If X is scum, then his arguments are scummy.
2) X is scum.

3) Therefore, X's arguments are scummy.

This is an invalid argument. It's not a good way to persuade anyone else that player X is scum, except perhaps that it might draw attention to the fact that player X hasn't produced any good arguments or evidence in his favour.

It may have value in terms of getting a reaction from player X or other players.