You are viewing the MafiaScum.net Wiki. To play the game, visit the forum.

False Dilemma: Difference between revisions

From MafiaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: A False Dilemma is when a player confronts another with a situation, and claiming that there is only one reasonable way out, because the only other way out is worse. For example, in a 5 pl...)
 
(term replacement)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A False Dilemma is when a player confronts another with a situation, and claiming that there is only one reasonable way out, because the only other way out is worse.
A False Dilemma is when a player confronts another with a situation, and claiming that there is only one reasonable way out, because the only other way out is worse.
For example, in a 5 player game with 2 scum:
For example, in a 5 player game with 2 scum:
* Player A: We have to lynch Player X.
* Player A: We have to eliminate Player X.
* Player B: Why?
* Player B: Why?
* Player A: Well, we either lynch Player X, or we go to [[No Lynch]], but if we go to [[No Lynch]], we'll lose.
* Player A: Well, we either eliminate Player X, or we go to [[No Elimination]], but if we go to [[No Elimination]], we'll lose.


This argument is fallacious, because lynching ''either'' Player X or going to No Lynch aren't the only possible results to the situation, and so the dilemma is false.
This argument is fallacious, because eliminating ''either'' Player X or going to No Elimination aren't the only possible results to the situation, and so the dilemma is false.


[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]

Latest revision as of 06:54, 4 July 2020

A False Dilemma is when a player confronts another with a situation, and claiming that there is only one reasonable way out, because the only other way out is worse. For example, in a 5 player game with 2 scum:

  • Player A: We have to eliminate Player X.
  • Player B: Why?
  • Player A: Well, we either eliminate Player X, or we go to No Elimination, but if we go to No Elimination, we'll lose.

This argument is fallacious, because eliminating either Player X or going to No Elimination aren't the only possible results to the situation, and so the dilemma is false.