You are viewing the MafiaScum.net Wiki. To play the game, visit the forum.

Correlation Implies Causation: Difference between revisions

From MafiaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (AKA...)
(term replacement)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
* Therefore, the consumption of ice cream is partly responsible for criminal behavior.<br>''(in truth, both actions are predicated by a different factor - increased temperatures)''
* Therefore, the consumption of ice cream is partly responsible for criminal behavior.<br>''(in truth, both actions are predicated by a different factor - increased temperatures)''


In a Mafia game, this logical fallacy can be used to create an appearance of guilty behavior  about someone else's actions. A common example is using someone's [[Lurking]] as evidence that they were avoiding lynching someone of their [[Faction]], or that they were the cause of a missed [[Night Choice]]. Frequently, the two actions are instead simultaneous but factually unrelated.
In a Mafia game, this logical fallacy can be used to create an appearance of guilty behavior  about someone else's actions. A common example is using someone's [[Lurking]] as evidence that they were avoiding [[elimination|eliminating]] someone of their [[Faction]], or that they were the cause of a missed [[Night Choice]]. Frequently, the two actions are instead simultaneous but factually unrelated.


[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]

Latest revision as of 06:49, 13 July 2020

Also known as Ignoring the Common Cause

Often independent factors are used to imply that one action causes another. A famous example is this:

  • Ice cream sales go up in the summer.
  • Criminal activity goes up in the summer.
  • Therefore, the consumption of ice cream is partly responsible for criminal behavior.
    (in truth, both actions are predicated by a different factor - increased temperatures)

In a Mafia game, this logical fallacy can be used to create an appearance of guilty behavior about someone else's actions. A common example is using someone's Lurking as evidence that they were avoiding eliminating someone of their Faction, or that they were the cause of a missed Night Choice. Frequently, the two actions are instead simultaneous but factually unrelated.