You are viewing the MafiaScum.net Wiki. To play the game, visit the forum.
Talk:Open Setup Certification Group Approved: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kublai Khan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(Maybe semi-protect it?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there any possibility that the members of the Open Setup Certification Group are granted access to this page? I wander here sometimes, and I'd edit in any setups that are missing, except it's protected. [[User:Korts|Korts]] 07:10, 13 July 2009 (EDT) | Is there any possibility that the members of the Open Setup Certification Group are granted access to this page? I wander here sometimes, and I'd edit in any setups that are missing, except it's protected. [[User:Korts|Korts]] 07:10, 13 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
*Okay. Andycyca had protected it to ward off Spammers and people adding unapproved setups. But I'll open it up to the public and we'll see how it goes. --[[User:Kublai Khan|Kublai Khan]] 09:01, 13 July 2009 (EDT) | *Okay. Andycyca had protected it to ward off Spammers and people adding unapproved setups. But I'll open it up to the public and we'll see how it goes. --[[User:Kublai Khan|Kublai Khan]] 09:01, 13 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
*Maybe semi-protect it? That would stop IP-spam, but let any registered user edit it. If somebody not in the OSCG adds, it should be checked. -- [[User:Mr. Flay|Mr.]] [[User_talk:Mr. Flay|Flay]] 20:58, 13 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 00:58, 14 July 2009
Is there any possibility that the members of the Open Setup Certification Group are granted access to this page? I wander here sometimes, and I'd edit in any setups that are missing, except it's protected. Korts 07:10, 13 July 2009 (EDT)
- Okay. Andycyca had protected it to ward off Spammers and people adding unapproved setups. But I'll open it up to the public and we'll see how it goes. --Kublai Khan 09:01, 13 July 2009 (EDT)
- Maybe semi-protect it? That would stop IP-spam, but let any registered user edit it. If somebody not in the OSCG adds, it should be checked. -- Mr. Flay 20:58, 13 July 2009 (EDT)